Image Credit: Getty Images
Jessica Alba and Cash Warren were present for their daughter Honor. They simply did not appear beside each other.
The paparazzi images from the commencement are now widespread. Jessica stood on one side. Cash stood on the other. A courteous, uncomfortable distance separated them. The accompanying text is doing its typical work. Acrimonious. Chilly. Awkward. The insinuation is that two adults who confirmed their separation back in January 2025 ought to manage a Hallmark co-parenting photo opportunity by June.
Upon observing those images, I perceive something entirely different. I see two nervous systems attempting to navigate a day for which biology was not equipped. And if you have ever had to be in the same vicinity as someone who was once significant to you, you understand precisely what I mean.
The Body Recalls What the Calendar Obliterated
Humankind is inherently an interdependent species. From infancy to old age, your nervous system is constantly assessing its surroundings, posing two silent inquiries. Are you available for me? Am I sufficient for you?
When a marriage dissolves, these inquiries are not erased. The connection is severed, but the biological imprint of that connection remains entirely intact. You finalized the divorce legally. Your physiology did not receive the notification.
A graduation ceremony compels you to be in close proximity once more with the individual who served as your foundation of security. The same auditorium. The same child. The same shared history occupying the folding chair between you. Yet, the sense of safety has vanished. Consequently, your nervous system interprets the situation as an imminent peril. You are suddenly vulnerable in the presence of the sole person who is acutely aware of your soft spots.
This is the point at which shame infiltrates. My preferred definition of shame is the most straightforward one I am familiar with. Shame is the sensation of being disconnected from belonging. It is the abrupt cessation of any positive emotion, supplanted by a fervent, sinking certainty that you do not fit anywhere in this space.
To endure this, we resort to what is termed the Compass of Shame. We direct animosity toward others. We direct animosity toward ourselves. We disavow. Or we retreat. When you witness two former partners standing a considerable distance apart, avoiding eye contact, you are observing retreat in its most refined manifestation. That is not animosity. It is a protective facet intervening to safeguard a wound that is still bleeding.
Parcels Across the Thoroughfare
I observe this phenomenon every Tuesday in my San Francisco practice. Entrepreneurs, executives, artists, all situated at opposing extremities of my couch, much like two strangers awaiting a bus, with their luggage placed across the street from each other.
They do not appear distressed. They appear rigid. They excel at what I refer to as describing the mango. They provide me with a precise, rational explanation of their ex-partner’s unreasonableness at the educational function. Their positioning. Whom they engaged with. The austerity of their demeanor. They can expound on the hue and texture of that mango for an entire hour. However, delineating the mango is an entirely different undertaking than the vulnerable act of experiencing its flavor.
What I genuinely discern in these high-achieving individuals is a person seeking refuge in the emotional subterranean. They experienced the entire graduation suffocating under private apprehension, quietly convinced of their inadequacy as a parent, a partner, or an individual. They maintain a facade of bravery. They pose for the photographs. They maintain a significant separation. The sheer energy expenditure required to feign such indifference is astounding.
Should any of this resonate deeply with you, you can ascertain your attachment style in approximately three minutes. It is the identical framework I employ with clients from the outset.
The recurring pattern I witness in my office resembles an echo chamber. One partner dispatches a stream of practical texts concerning the agenda to project capability. The other responds with a solitary thumbs-up icon to maintain emotional distance. The more one individual extends an overture, the deeper the other withdraws. They are no longer engaged in conflict. They are projecting intangible projectiles of censure and defense, preserving a secure interval, both ensnared in separate spheres of suffering, both persuaded that the other is culpable.
Separation Is Evidence of the Connection
Societal expectations dictate that Jessica and Cash perform a conscious uncoupling. Occupy adjacent seats. Offer smiles. Disregard the shared history weighing upon them.
I view it from the inverse perspective. The uncomfortable spatial separation is not indicative of mutual animosity. It is evidence that they held such profound regard for one another that the loss is presently biologically unbearable. If they were indifferent, their nervous systems would not necessitate such an extensive defensive buffer. One can sit comfortably beside a stranger because they hold no significance. One cannot sit comfortably beside the individual who inflicted heartbreak because the body retains the memory of the bond’s intensity.
Every romantic severance carries two facets of pain. The dread of inadequacy. And the fear of excess. When a marriage concludes, it validates whichever of these was your most profound apprehension. Every exchange of glances across the gymnasium amplifies the present agony by two hundred units of past suffering. That is a formidable burden to bear while attired formally and feigning enjoyment of a visual presentation.
This also explains why much of what appears as aloof post-divorce conduct is more akin to relational trauma than apathy. The body is behaving precisely as bodies do when wounded by someone they confided in.
There are no villains depicted in the photograph. There are two apprehensive individuals in adult forms employing the sole resources at their disposal.
What I Would Articulate to Them
If Jessica and Cash were to recline on my couch, fatigued by the intricate coordination of graduation day, my initial action would be to halt the charade. It is impossible to resolve a limbic predicament with cognitive strategies. One cannot logically attain comfort in the vicinity of an ex-partner.
I would implore each of them to direct the beam of their awareness away from the other’s actions and toward their inner experience. The arduous transition involves shifting from the Narrative of the Other to the Lived Experience of Self. What sensations are manifesting in my chest at this moment. Where am I restricting my breath. What is the earliest manifestation of this emotion.
This adjustment is more beneficial than a multitude of practical communications. It is also more challenging than it sounds, which is why I draw upon the scientific principles of unrequited affection and yearning when elucidating why post-divorce co-parenting proves so distressing, even when the affection itself has transformed.
The objective is not to feign closeness. The objective is to cease employing the distance as a weapon against oneself. To accept the twenty-foot separation as adequate. To affirm internally, this is difficult because it held significance, not because I am flawed.
The Authentic Narrative Within That Image
Jessica attended. Cash attended. Honor crossed the stage with both her parents present. That is not a depiction of marital failure. That is two individuals prioritizing their child above their own comfort, navigating in adult bodies, with sensitive nervous systems they are still learning to manage.
Heartbreak does not need to be visually appealing to be dignified.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Figs O’Sullivan and his wife Teale are specialists in couples therapy in San Francisco, recognized authorities on relationships for celebrities and the Silicon Valley elite, founders of Empathi, and creators of Figlet, an AI-driven relationship assistant trained on their professional practice.